CentBrowser Forum
Cent Browser 2.0.10.57(for Windows) Released - Printable Version

+- CentBrowser Forum (https://www.centbrowser.net/en)
+-- Forum: Product Related (https://www.centbrowser.net/en/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Release Channel (https://www.centbrowser.net/en/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+--- Thread: Cent Browser 2.0.10.57(for Windows) Released (/showthread.php?tid=1112)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12


RE: Cent Browser 2.0.10.57(for Windows) Released - Admin - 10-01-2016

(10-01-2016, 04:53 PM)badablek Wrote: Thanks, works perfectly ! I didn't knew that command line.

BTW, is there a chance you add an option in CB parameters to fully disable material design ? It should be much better than a command-line (or the flag that doesn't work anymore).

Yes, it can be added.
We will take it into consideration.
In fact you can disable extension redesign and material design by a single command line:
--extension-action-redesign=0 --top-chrome-md=non-material


RE: Cent Browser 2.0.10.57(for Windows) Released - reactor - 10-02-2016

find-next (f3) does not work after find (ctrl-f) flow: ctrl-F: enter a search word F3 (search next) -> does not work Sad

centbrowser_2.1.9.49.exe


RE: Cent Browser 2.0.10.57(for Windows) Released - badablek - 10-02-2016

(10-01-2016, 06:26 PM)CentBrowser Wrote:
(10-01-2016, 04:53 PM)badablek Wrote: Thanks, works perfectly ! I didn't knew that command line.

BTW, is there a chance you add an option in CB parameters to fully disable material design ? It should be much better than a command-line (or the flag that doesn't work anymore).

Yes, it can be added.
We will take it into consideration.
In fact you can disable extension redesign and material design by a single command line:
--extension-action-redesign=0 --top-chrome-md=non-material

this would be awesome. Thanks for taking it into consideration, it will save time for all "material design" haters like me Biggrin


RE: Cent Browser 2.0.10.57(for Windows) Released - QuadCore - 10-03-2016

(09-06-2016, 05:52 PM)CentBrowser Wrote: Thank you but not necessary, we knew the difference.
Maybe some Anti-Alias source code is missing, we will try to figure it out.

I wonder if you have located the problem. Just checked out beta, and fonts of browser UI with directwrite still look weird  Undecided


RE: Cent Browser 2.0.10.57(for Windows) Released - killerbreu - 10-03-2016

version final? centbrowser_2.1.9.50 ?


RE: Cent Browser 2.0.10.57(for Windows) Released - Admin - 10-03-2016

(10-03-2016, 01:00 AM)QuadCore Wrote: I wonder if you have located the problem. Just checked out beta, and fonts of browser UI with directwrite still look weird  Undecided

Yes, this issue has not been solved yet.


RE: Cent Browser 2.0.10.57(for Windows) Released - Admin - 10-03-2016

(10-03-2016, 04:31 PM)killerbreu Wrote: version final? centbrowser_2.1.9.50 ?

Yes, it is.


RE: Cent Browser 2.0.10.57(for Windows) Released - Admin - 10-03-2016

(10-02-2016, 08:40 AM)badablek Wrote: this would be awesome. Thanks for taking it into consideration, it will save time for all "material design" haters like me Biggrin

I believe you will accept "Material Design" in one day, I suppose it is a great improvement in Chromium UI.


RE: Cent Browser 2.0.10.57(for Windows) Released - Admin - 10-03-2016

(10-02-2016, 07:43 AM)reactor Wrote: find-next (f3) does not work after find (ctrl-f) flow: ctrl-F: enter a search word F3 (search next) -> does not work Sad

centbrowser_2.1.9.49.exe

Did you assign F3 to another function?


RE: Cent Browser 2.0.10.57(for Windows) Released - piliq - 10-03-2016

A bug with downloading. The name of temporary file is "Не подтвержден 535352.crdownload" in my case. v2.1.9.49. In stable it was normal, just like "centbrowser_2.1.9.50_x64_portable.exe.crdownload"