Cent already has quite a lot offeatures that Chrome doesn't have, so how about improvimg their Tab Groups concept with control of loading?
Gropus obviosly expected to have a lot of tabs, which means huge lags when loading such groupsand all tabs loading at ones = adding lazy loading would make process much more comfortable.

I have Lazy Loading enabled and noticed, that when closing browser while being on tab in group - next time i start browser only that tab is loaded, while group is kept un-loaded as any other non-grouped tabs. So i presume it's quite possible to add same option when group is opened from tab bar icon. Or am i wrong and that's too different?..

Loading 1 tab out of group of say 40 tabs, is defenitely faster and more comfortable than waiting for all 40 to load. 

Can somebody please explain to me what some Tab Grouping features do?

So here i created a group, right clicked it and there is a toggle Save Group = what it actually does? I see it adds launch icon to tab bar - so it's actually bookmark = then why call it Save?
At the same time, if i right click on that group icon in tab bar there is UnPin command that erases icon from tab bar, BUT when i click on group in tab bar - Save Group is still toggled On... Feels like strange contradiction.

There is another menu item - Hide Group, which results in group disappearing from tab bar = so it's actually Close group = why call it Hide?

When i click group icon in bookmarks bar(created above) it launches whole group loading all tabs.(Which is inconvenient) I enabled Lazy tabs loading, but that changed nothing, whole group is still loaded at the same time. Is there a way to open a group but only one tab loaded? 
So far i found only way to open one link from group in a separate(non-grouped tab)

Initially i thought groups are usefull to say have all tabs of same domain "visually distinct", or to make "same thematic" pages be gropped for easier bookmarking, but since group is loaded at once it brakes the reason to use groups for that. So what are they for?

Привет всем ! Почему-то у меня в браузере показывает что я не зашел в учетную запись гугла . Хотя я зашел в Thorium такой проблемы не было . Кто подскаже это у всех так и как-то фиксится? 2. Вопрос : нельзя ли убрать эту назойливую фичу ( поиск по изображениям) каким нибудь образом через  chrome://flags/

Attached Files

Thumbnail(s)
       

Здравствуйте, пожалуйста, проверьте на сайте w3dota.com в разделе «Таблица лидеров», не зависает ли ваш браузер при поиске игроков.

I noticed the empty space on my system drive disappearing and discovered a folder that isn't cleared when I clear the cache.
USER\AppData\Local\CentBrowser\User Data\component_crx_cache
deleting all files from this directory does not lead to any fatal consequences
There's no similar folder in Google Chrome. The folder's size
USER\AppData\Local\Google\Chrome\User Data
isn't growing uncontrollably. I add folder component_crx_cache to CCleaner.
Please, add the folder to Disk Cleanup in browser, is it possible.
P.S. Most likely, the folder size increased dramatically after experimenting with subtitles.

Quote:The component_crx_cache folder in Chromium-based browsers (Edge, Brave, Chrome) stores cached extension and component files, often causing large file size issues, failed profile syncs, and HTTP 413 errors in virtualized environments. It is safe to delete, though it will likely regenerate. Excluding %localappdata%\Microsoft\Edge\User Data\component_crx_cache from syncing resolves these issues.

I just downloaded the latest portable 5.2.1168.83 to my Windows 10 PC.  Installed Ublock Origin + several other of my favorite extensions.  Created a few bookmarks.  Copied it to USB thumb drive, copied it to my Windows 7 laptop, all extensions and bookmarks all present.

No other Chrome browser does this, even those that claim to be portable (the browsers are portable but extensions have to be re-installed on every machine and bookmarks don't get copied so not really portable).  This is the main reason I prefer Mozilla over Chromium for portable browsers.

Keep up the good work and please maintain support for Manifest v2 so Ublock Origin, best adblocker available continues to function.
All other Chromium browser are Manifest v3 so no Ublock Origin, only crippled Ublock lite.

Hi,
Please how to change folders icon color in bookmark manager, I want to restore its original color (yellow, yellow orange), as the color now is make confusing with some bookmarks, so changing color will be easily distinguishable.

Thanks

Hi, your browser is very efficient, however, the multi-logging issue makes tab management quite difficult. Is there a way to name tabs instead of using just colored dots?

I always use incognito mode, but after updating to v5.2.1168.83, I discovered that the "Browser" task (apparently) wasn't garbage collecting, leading to a very rapid increase in the memory footprint. When the memory footprint exceeded 200,000K+, every time I opened a new tab (both the new tab and the webpage), it would lag for a few seconds, and CPU usage would increase by 100+.

   

Even after I tried killing all tabs, the memory footprint of the "Browser" task continued to grow (though it slowed down), and the CPU usage remained consistently between 1 and 10+.

   

I've identified several (possible) causes:

1. Blob storage isn't garbage collected:

When checking chrome://blob-internals/, I found many blobs listed there, some with very large lengths (see attached image below). With the increasing memory footprint of the "Browser" task, more blobs are being created here.

   

Because it's incognito mode, the "Delete browsing data" feature is completely useless. Even when opening a regular tab and checking chrome://blob-internals/, I see many other blobs there, even though I'm not browsing with a regular tab.

2. Affected by other Chromium-based browsers:

After opening CentBrowser, every time I open other Chromium-based browsers or Chromium Embedded Framework (CEF) Client Applications, the memory footprint of the "Browser" task increases rapidly, by about 30,000K each time if the current "Browser" task's memory footprint is below 200,000K, and gradually decreases if it's already above 200,000K. It seems there's a cross-memory leak here?!

I checked the chrome.exe file of the x86 (32-bit) CentBrowser version using the "dumpbin" command and found that the "LARGEADDRESSAWARE" flag was enabled. However:

- When opening a heavy website (like Facebook), which uses only about 1.5 GB of memory, it immediately crashes with an "Error code: Out of Memory" error.

- When the CPU usage of the Dev Tools tab is high (~100%), after a few seconds, it crashes as shown in the attached image below.

As can be seen, it encountered an error very early on, even though it was still far from the limit of a typical 32-bit process. The "LARGEADDRESSAWARE" flag therefore did not function.

Attached Files

Thumbnail(s)